Tuesday, May 07th

Sign up for our FREE newsletters now!

Facebook Page: 181583088528500 Twitter: lisawexler YouTube: lisawex
 
Error
  • Error loading feed data.

News You Need To Know

Hear This: F-U to all Jews

E-mail Print

Even this tolerant town has its limits.

You simply do not invite Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, a pure evil crackpot Holocaust denier who wants to see Israel obliterated from planet Earth, to the United Nations on Yom Kippur, a Day of Atonement, the holiest day in the Jewish calendar.

This is not just an affront to the Jews.

This is a spit in the face to all the tolerant people of this big-hearted city that plays host to the United Nations because no other city on the planet has a citizenry patient and worldwise enough to put up with the theater of the absurd that usually plays out there.

We put up with the United Nations because we are the capital of the world.

But even New York has to stop and shout that inviting Ahmadinejad to the UN on Yom Kippur explodes the envelope.

This is a vile, disgusting, detestable publicity stunt.

Inviting Ahmadinejad to the UN on Yom Kippur is a treacherous piece of stagecraft designed to promote hate for a particular people who helped make this city great — a meanspirited gimmick that desecrates the memory of 6 million murdered Jews with the histrionic antics of the world’s best-known anti-Semite on the holiest day of the Jewish year.

For shame.

The United Nations, created as a body to promote world peace, has gone out of its way to create disharmony and division by inviting Ahmadinejad, who will inject more venom into the bloodstream of the world on American shores during a presidential campaign, hoping to poison even the forgiving spirit of Yom Kippur.

This is a purely hostile political act.

The best way to deal with this hateful publicity stunt would be, of course, to ignore this monster. It would be perfect justice if all the editors in this media capital simply spiked all stories about this repulsive creep at this miserable event. It would be a perfect antidote if we aired no TV news footage and rendered what’s his face insignificant.

But that’s not gonna happen.

Ahmadinejad has a loud and unforgiving voice in Iran, which is the latest hot-button country in the Middle East, the country that Israel sees as its greatest threat, the nation that both Barack Obama and Mitt Romney have drawn a nuclear red line in front of in the sand.

Ahmadinejad, a megalomaniacal tyrant, loves being the center of attention, and what better way to grab the world spotlight than to spread hate about the Jews in the UN on Yom Kippur?

This cheap, evil gimmick will get global media saturation, showing this twisted little man grinning on the world stage, spreading his invective like a global flu.

The United Nations loses what little credibility it had left with this latest affront to human decency.

Even New York, the most tolerant city in the world, has its limits.

It is also a slap in the face to this great city that Ahmadinejad has been invited to speak at the UN on Yom Kippur.

If the UN has a shred of guts or decency left, it will postpone his address. If it doesn’t, we might consider an eviction notice.



Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/ahmadinejad-yom-kippur-speech-outrage-new-york-city-article-1.1167560#ixzz27UYKblvnAhmadenijad

Violent protests target embassies, Thousands in Kashmir protest anti-Islam film

E-mail Print
alt

Thousands of angry Kashmiri Muslims protested Friday against an anti-Islam film, burning U.S. flags and calling President Barack Obama a "terrorist," while the top government cleric here reportedly demanded Americans leave the volatile Indian-controlled region immediately.

In the southern Indian city of Chennai, protesters threw stones at the U.S. Consulate, shattering some windows and burning Obama in effigy. Police quickly cleared the area, arresting more than 100 protesters. U.S. Embassy officials in Delhi did not immediately comment.

In Bangladesh, about 5,000 hard-line Muslims marched through the streets of the capital, Dhaka, after Friday prayers, burning U.S. and Israeli flags and calling for the arrest and death of the filmmaker. Police prevented them from marching toward the U.S. Embassy, which was several miles away.

The low-budget film "Innocence of Muslims," produced by a filmmaker in the United States, ridicules Islam and depicts the Prophet Muhammad as a fraud, a womanizer and a madman. American and Middle Eastern leaders have denounced the film and condemned acts of violence by protesters. In Libya, the American ambassador and three other staff members were killed when the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi was attacked.

Authorities in Indian-controlled Kashmir have asked the Indian government to block online clips from the film, the region's top police official Ashok Prasad said Friday.

Across Kashmir, at least 15,000 people took part in more than two dozen protests, chanting "Down with America" and "Down with Israel" in some of the largest anti-American demonstrations against the film in Asia.

U.S. and Israeli flags were burned at many of the protests across the Muslim-majority region. Hundreds of lawyers in the main city of Srinagar stopped work and marched out of court and into the streets in protest. One protester held a poster with Obama's picture and the words "real terrorist."

"The U.S. citizens visiting Kashmir should leave immediately as the sentiments of the Muslims have been hurt by these pictures," Mufti Bashiruddin Ahmad, Kashmir's state-appointed cleric, was quoted as telling the Kashmir Reader, an English daily.

In response to the statement, U.S. Embassy officials sent out a message reiterating its call for citizens to stay away from Kashmir, a volatile territory where many oppose India's rule. Police said they were investigating the cleric's statement.

Though many local separatists groups disavowed the threat to Americans, local authorities put five top separatist leaders under house arrest, a common action when protests or violence is expected.

Jamat-e-Islami, Kashmir's biggest Islamic party, demanded the U.S. government crack down on the filmmakers.

"If America is true in its claim of being against any kind of religious blasphemy, then it should lose no time in taking stern action against these enemies of humanity," a statement from the party said.

Meanwhile, in Indonesia, the world's most populous Muslim nation, about 200 protesters in Jakarta chanted slogans and held up signs in a largely peaceful protest outside the heavily guarded U.S. Embassy. American diplomatic outposts increased security worldwide this week after clips of the film went viral online and sparked violent protests in the Middle East.

"We came here because we want the U.S. to punish whoever was involved with the film," protester Abdul Jabar Umam said. "They should know that we are willing to die to defend the honor of our Prophet."

About 20 protesters outside the U.S. Embassy in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, shouted "Allahu akbar!" and handed reporters a letter addressed to the U.S. ambassador expressing their anger over the movie and calling for greater respect for religions.

Indonesia's government has been working to block access to clips of the film online, and a prominent cleric has urged calm. But others are calling for Muslims worldwide to defend the dignity of the Prophet Muhammad.

Hizbut Tahrir Indonesia, a branch of the international network that advocates a worldwide Islamic state and the ones who organized the protest, on its website blamed the U.S. government for allowing the film to be produced and released, calling it "an act of barbarism that cannot go unpunished."

"Why do these people seek problems by disturbing our peace? They knew the risk they were facing by angering people," said Muhammad Al-Khaththath, leader of another hardliner group. "There's only one way to stop our anger: Give the death penalty to the filmmaker and the actors."Meanwhile, in Indonesia, the world's most populous Muslim nation, about 200 protesters in Jakarta chanted slogans and held up signs in a largely peaceful protest outside the heavily guarded U.S. Embassy. American diplomatic outposts increased security worldwide this week after clips of the film went viral online and sparked violent protests in the Middle East.

"We came here because we want the U.S. to punish whoever was involved with the film," protester Abdul Jabar Umam said. "They should know that we are willing to die to defend the honor of our Prophet."

About 20 protesters outside the U.S. Embassy in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, shouted "Allahu akbar!" and handed reporters a letter addressed to the U.S. ambassador expressing their anger over the movie and calling for greater respect for religions.

Indonesia's government has been working to block access to clips of the film online, and a prominent cleric has urged calm. But others are calling for Muslims worldwide to defend the dignity of the Prophet Mohammed.

Hizbut Tahrir Indonesia, a branch of the international network that advocates a worldwide Islamic state and the ones who organized the protest, on its website blamed the U.S. government for allowing the film to be produced and released, calling it "an act of barbarism that cannot go unpunished."

"Why do these people seek problems by disturbing our peace? They knew the risk they were facing by angering people," said Muhammad Al-Khaththath, leader of another hardliner group. "There's only one way to stop our anger: Give the death penalty to the filmmaker and the actors."

In Egypt, riot police clashed with protesters angry over an anti-Islam film blocks away from the U.S. Embassy in Cairo as the president went on state TV and appealed to Muslims to protect embassies, trying to patch up strained relations with the United States.

Several hundred protesters massed in Cairo's Tahrir Square after weekly Muslim Friday prayers and tore up an American flag, waving a black, Islamist flag. When protesters tried to move toward the embassy, several blocks away, they were confronted by lines of police who fired tear gas.

"With our soul, our blood, we will avenge you, our Prophet," they chanted.

Ahead of the clashes, Islamist President Mohammed Morsi spoke for more than seven minutes on state TV, his most direct public move to contain protests since an angry crowd assaulted the embassy Tuesday night, scaling its walls and tearing down the American flag.

"It is required by our religion to protect our guests and their homes and places of work," Morsi said. "So I call on all to consider this, consider the law, and not attack embassies, consulates, diplomatic missions or Egyptian property that is private or public."

He denounced the killing of the American ambassador in Libya, who died in an attack Tuesday night on the U.S. Consulate in the eastern Libyan city of Benghazi along with three other Americans.

"This is something we reject and Islam rejects. To God, the attack on a person to Allah is bigger an attack on the Kaaba," he said, referring to Islam's holiest site in Mecca.

Morsi's own Muslim Brotherhood group has called for peaceful protests to denounce the film.

Protesters have been clashing in Cairo with police since the unrest Tuesday night. More than 240 people have been injured in the clashes, including a number of policemen, and 31 people have been arrested.

In Sudan, a prominent sheikh urged people on state radio to protest outside the main mosque in Khartoum. Sheikh Mohammed Jizouly said protesters would then move to the German Embassy in the city center to protest alleged anti-Muslim scrawling on mosques in Berlin and then to the US embassy, just outside the capital, to protest the film.

"America has long been an enemy to Islam and to Sudan," Jizouly said.

In Israel, police spokesman Micky Rosenfeld said police have boosted the number of officers patrolling east Jerusalem and Jerusalem's old city to thwart potentially violent protests following Muslim prayers at the Al-Aqsa mosque, Islam's third holiest site. Protesters are expected to march to the U.S. consulate in Jerusalem.

Meanwhile, a Libyan airport official said all flights to and from the eastern city of Benghazi were canceled due to security concerns. The nearest airport is 200 kilometers away. The airport official spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to release the information.

Benghazi is where the attack on the U.S. consulate took place Tuesday.

-----------------

Associated Press

DNC 2012: The 5 Democratic politicians to watch in Charlotte

E-mail Print
altCHARLOTTE, N.C. — This isn't just a party for Barack Obama — it's also an unmatched career opportunity for a batch of up-and-coming pols to shine on the national stage and lay a path to higher office.  Among those looking to seize the moment are a state legislator whose brother will give one of the week’s biggest speeches, an ambitious attorney general and a city councilwoman from Hawaii trying to become the first Hindu-American elected to Congress.

Some of them aren’t yet well known to the party faithful, but a commanding speaking performance could quickly change that.

(PHOTOS: Who’s who in Charlotte)

Here’s POLITICO’s look at five Democrats to watch in Charlotte:

JOAQUIN CASTRO

Much attention this week will be focused on Julian Castro, the San Antonio mayor and convention keynoter.

But Joaquin Castro, the mayor’s twin brother, will also be under the bright lights.

A Texas state representative who is on a glide path to winning a congressional seat, Castro will be introducing his brother on Tuesday evening. He’ll also be hopscotching to a long list of House Democratic-sponsored events, including a dinner for the party’s leadership and a gathering with the Congressional Hispanic Caucus.

(PHOTOS: Scheduled 2012 convention speakers)

It’s all part of Castro’s effort to ingratiate himself with Democratic higher-ups before he arrives in Washington in January. The up-and-comer has already transferred over $100,000 from his campaign account to the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee and House candidates who face far tougher races than he does.

The Castro brothers present an important face for Democrats at a time when the party is trying to intensify its appeal to Hispanic voters.

Castro said he would focus his remarks on telling the story of his brother and his tenure as mayor. He said he’d already seen drafts of the address, promising, “I think he’s prepared a great speech.”

JOYCE BEATTY

Beatty hasn’t yet been elected to the House — she’s expected to coast in November — but she’s already emerged as a favorite of party leaders. Last month, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi traveled to Beatty’s Columbus, Ohio, district for a forum with her on health care policy.

Now, she’s been rewarded with a speaking slot in Charlotte. A former state House minority leader, she’s one of several female congressional candidates slated to address delegates.

Beatty told POLITICO that her speech would focus on what’s likely to be a prominent theme for Democrats: the role of women in the economy.

(PHOTOS: Female speakers slated for the DNC)

Also on tap for Beatty: a full slate of leadership-sponsored events including a Pelosi confab, a luncheon hosted by DCCC Chairman Steve Israel and events for House Minority Whip Steny Hoyer and South Carolina Rep. Jim Clyburn.

Like Castro, Beatty has worked hard to grease the wheels of leadership: She’s shipped off $25,000 to the DCCC.

KAMALA HARRIS

Harris won’t be on the ballot in 2012 — but she might be two years from now.

The Californian’s prospects skyrocketed in 2010, when she was elected state attorney general — a popular launching pad for ambitious pols. If Gov. Jerry Brown, who is 74 years old, decides to forgo reelection, as some political observers believe is possible, Harris would become a leading contender for the spot.

Harris, an Obama campaign national co-chair, will play an outsized role in Charlotte, delivering a speech before delegates in which she will discuss the steps she has taken to address California’s mortgage crisis.

To her political advisers, the convention is an opportunity to raise Harris’s political profile. The California top cop will also conduct a national media tour while she’s here.

“People haven’t had an opportunity to get to know Kamala yet,” said Debbie Mesloh, a Harris spokeswoman.

TAMMY DUCKWORTH

Unlike many of the congressional candidates making their way to Charlotte, Duckworth won’t need much of an introduction.

As Democrats made their way into the hall on Monday, many of them plopped down cash for “Duckworth for Congress” T-shirts.

The Iraq War veteran and former top official at the Department of Veterans Affairs has been a liberal hero ever since she narrowly lost a 2006 congressional race. This year, Duckworth, who lost both of her legs in combat, is back — looking to unseat Illinois Rep. Joe Walsh, a bomb-throwing freshman conservative whom Democrats love to hate.

On Tuesday evening, Duckworth will take the stage for a six-minute speech. A Duckworth spokeswoman said the address would focus on her combat experience while highlighting President Barack Obama’s accomplishments.

Her high profile at the convention reflects the close relationship she has with the president and his inner circle. During her hard-fought primary campaign this spring, she emerged as an Obamaland favorite, winning endorsements from the likes of David Axelrod and Rahm Emanuel.

TULSI GABBARD

Gabbard has a background Democrats love: a 31-year-old female Iraq War veteran who’s on course to become the first Hindu-American in Congress.

The Honolulu City councilwoman’s speech is a national coming out party of sorts for the Hawaii congressional candidate.

Like Duckworth, Gabbard plans to focus her speech on her combat experience, she said in an interview.

She will also be spending her time here introducing herself to party higher-ups, attending events with Pelosi, Israel and Hoyer.



Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0912/80619_Page2.html#ixzz25VceOH9E
  

 

 

Ann Romney Soars, Chris Christie Stumbles in Kicking Off the Republican Convention

E-mail Print

alt
The candidate’s wife scored in describing a “real marriage” while the governor barely mentioned Romney. Howard Kurtz on an uneven convention kickoff.
The spouse and the would-be running mate faced similar challenges on Tuesday night, to do for Mitt Romney what he has been unable to do for himself. Ann Romney, by far the warmer of the couple, had some success. Chris Christie, who flirted with a presidential run, did himself a whole lot of good, but maybe not much for Romney.

They combined to kick off the Republican convention with a singular task: to offer a richer portrait of a nominee who somehow, at this late date, still needs a proper introduction to the American people.

Ann Romney was at her best when she talked about falling for “this boy I met at a high-school dance” who “made me laugh.” Tossing aside the notion that they have a “storybook marriage,” she recalled her struggles with MS and breast cancer, informing the country that they have a “real marriage.” And she sketched her husband’s business career, adding: “Mitt doesn’t like to talk about how he has helped others because he sees it as a privilege, not a political talking point.”

But she strained credulity in talking about how they first lived in a basement apartment and ate tuna fish. That struck a false note. And it underscored her rhetorical challenge as an equestrian who is part of a wealthy family: to relate to the problems of ordinary voters.

Ann Romney attempted to do that by talking about the stories she had heard on the trail, the working moms who would like to work a little less hard, the couple not sure they can afford another child, the worry about grocery bills and gas prices. But this soon turned into a blatant bit of pandering for the female vote, with such lines as “you are the hope of America.” Her husband, after all, faces a huge gender gap against Barack Obama.

Still, she finished strong by declaring, “This man will not fail.” And at least some Romney skeptics must have thought, if he’s married to her, he can’t be all bad.

Christie devoted the first part of his speech to himself, as a Springsteen-loving son of the Jersey Shore. Then he made the case that he had saved his state from fiscal ruin. Then he made a heartfelt case for education and entitlement reform.

Finally, the governor got around to the party’s nominee. “Mitt Romney will tell us the hard truths we need to hear to put us back on the path to growth and create good paying private-sector jobs again in America,” Christie said.

At least some Romney skeptics must have thought, if he’s married to her, he can’t be all bad.

There was a mild shot at the president—“Real leaders don’t follow polls. Real leaders change polls”—and a closing call for a Second American Century.

It was an odd approach for a keynote speech. Yes, it contained the requisite praise, but Romney was almost an afterthought. There wasn’t a personal line about Mitt. It was as though the two had never met.

Ann Romney stole the evening, doing exactly what the campaign’s strategists hoped she would do. No single speech can change the perception of a reserved and often awkward politician overnight. But the Romney campaign can hope this was a start. 
FROM:THE DAILY BEAST: | August 28, 2012 11:05 PM EDT 

Raped, Pregnant And Ordeal Not Over: Rapist Can Sue For Parental Rights!

E-mail Print
altBy Shauna Prewitt, listen HERE To hear her interview on OUR show:

When I was in law school, my criminal law professor introduced us to the crime of rape by reading us a quote from Lord Chief Justice Sir Matthew Hale, a 17th-century English jurist: "In a rape case it is the victim, not the defendant, who is on trial." It was not merely a history lesson. I had lived it.
While a student in my final year of college, at age 21, I was raped. I have dissected that moment -- the horrifying moment that I became a "victim" -- from every possible angle. I have poked and prodded, examined and re-examined. Regrettably, I have even suspected myself in a desperate, ultimately futile attempt to understand how I became a victim.

But blaming myself was neither my idea nor my first inclination. I thought such 17th-century notions were long dead. I was wrong. People who did not even know me were quick to comment or speculate on my rape. What were you wearing? Did you scream loudly? Did this occur in public? 

As my history lesson said, I found myself on trial, facing the most fierce judge and jury: ignorance. 

Eight years after my rape, I find myself on trial against ignorance again. Rep. Todd Akin's recent comments that "legitimate rape" rarely results in pregnancy not only flout scientific fact but, for me, cut deeper. Akin has de-legitimized my rape.
You see, nine months after my rape, I gave birth to a beautiful little girl. You could say she was conceived in rape; she was. But she is also so much more than her beginnings. I blissfully believed that after I finally had decided to give birth to and to raise my daughter, life would be all roses and endless days at the playground. I was wrong again.
It would not be long before I would learn firsthand that in the vast majority of states -- 31 -- men who father through rape are able to assert the same custody and visitation rights to their children that other fathers enjoy. When no law prohibits a rapist from exercising these rights, a woman may feel forced to bargain away her legal rights to a criminal trial in exchange for the rapist dropping the bid to have access to her child.
Opinion: Wake up, it's not just Akin
When faced with the choice between a lifetime tethered to her rapist or meaningful legal redress, the answer may be easy, but it is not painless. For the sake of her child, the woman will sacrifice her need to see her once immensely powerful perpetrator humbled by the court.
I know it because I lived it. I went to law school to learn how to stop it.
Having fought this injustice for the past several years, I have come to believe that ignorance is to blame for this legal absence. Opponents argue no woman would ever choose to raise the child she conceived through rape. The only two studies to analyze the choices made by pregnant raped women indicate otherwise -- at least 30% of women who conceive by rape make this choice.
Others argue that no rapist would ever seek parental rights. Not only does my experience and that of others I know prove otherwise, but it is not surprising that a man who cruelly degrades a woman would also seek to torture her in an even more agonizing way, by seeking access to her child.
Today, it seems we may face a new and unbelievable challenge: convincing legislators that women can conceive when they are raped.
iReport: 'Rape is rape'
Make no mistake, my efforts and the efforts of others to persuade legislators to pass laws restricting the parental rights of men who father through rape will be directly impacted by Akin's recent comments. Whether these efforts will be helped or hurt, however, depends upon us as a society.
Either we will fight ignorance and take steps to legislate for raped women based upon reason and facts, or we will be led by ignorance and continue to make bad laws. Or fail to make good ones.

CNN
Shauna R. Prewitt is a lawyer in Chicago. She is the author of "Giving Birth to a 'Rapist's Child': A Discussion and Analysis of the Limited Legal Protections Afforded to Women Who Become Mothers Through Rape," written for the Georgetown Law Journal.  

Page 2 of 35

Cheapest viagra without prescription 100mg viagra online without prescription buy Viagra 200mg here canadian pharmacy viagra for sale online Topical Erectile Dysfunction Therapy Shows Promise ED Drug Uprima Often Ineffective: Study Consuming of vitamin C is very effective in curing erectile dysfunction. Vitamin C helps in reducing the cholesterol level from your body. It also helps you to keep erection of the male sexual organ as it gives proper flow of blood to the male sexual organ. Take vitamin C 3 times a day. how not to be deceived by buying viagra online canadian viagra for sale

Levitra sales » Online Canadian Drugstore